Reigate and Banstead, in numbers

Your area: Reigate and Banstead

Reigate and Banstead local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Neighbourhood differences

Homes rented privately

7.2% to 27.8%

Homes rented privately ranged from 7.2% in Nork to 27.8% in Redhill East — a gap of 20.7 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented privately · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Nork	7.2%	253	3,522
Horley West & Sidlow	8.7%	367	4,231
Tattenham Corner & Preston	8.8%	371	4,228
South Park & Woodhatch	9%	319	3,549
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	9.8%	396	4,033
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	10.4%	393	3,778
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	12.3%	536	4,353
Banstead Village	12.5%	459	3,676
Horley East & Salfords	18.1%	713	3,947
Meadvale & St John's	19.5%	688	3,523
Redhill West & Wray Common	21.3%	888	4,161
Earlswood & Whitebushes	21.7%	907	4,182
Reigate	22.9%	1,043	4,563
Horley Central & South	23.1%	982	4,254
Redhill East	27.8%	1,070	3,843

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People reporting bad or very bad health

2.1% to 4.6%

People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.1% in Meadvale & St John's to 4.6% in Horley Central & South — a gap of 2.6 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People reporting bad or very bad health · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Meadvale & St John's	2.1%	187	9,004
Reigate	2.6%	276	10,737
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	2.6%	255	9,731
Redhill East	2.8%	263	9,315
Nork	2.8%	265	9,359
Horley East & Salfords	2.9%	294	9,996
Horley West & Sidlow	3.1%	341	10,875
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	3.2%	317	9,860
Earlswood & Whitebushes	3.4%	341	10,122
Redhill West & Wray Common	3.6%	385	10,655
Tattenham Corner & Preston	4%	422	10,549
Banstead Village	4.2%	420	10,088
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	4.2%	478	11,291
South Park & Woodhatch	4.5%	407	9,144
Horley Central & South	4.6%	470	10,118

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 65 or over

11.1% to 25.9%

People aged 65 or over ranged from 11.1% in Redhill East to 25.9% in Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton — a gap of 14.7 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 65 or over · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Redhill East	11.1%	1,037	9,317
Earlswood & Whitebushes	12.6%	1,276	10,122
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	13.3%	1,506	11,291
Meadvale & St John's	13.6%	1,222	9,002
Redhill West & Wray Common	15.6%	1,658	10,653
Horley East & Salfords	15.9%	1,588	9,993
Tattenham Corner & Preston	16.2%	1,705	10,548
Horley West & Sidlow	16.2%	1,765	10,877
South Park & Woodhatch	16.4%	1,497	9,144
Horley Central & South	19%	1,925	10,117
Reigate	20.5%	2,199	10,746
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	21.4%	2,085	9,729
Nork	23.2%	2,171	9,358
Banstead Village	25.1%	2,534	10,088
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	25.9%	2,551	9,861

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

8.1% to 17.1%

People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 8.1% in Meadvale & St John's to 17.1% in Horley Central & South — a gap of 9 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with no qualifications · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Meadvale & St John's	8.1%	564	6,947
Reigate	9.3%	800	8,612
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	11.2%	892	8,000
Redhill East	11.2%	829	7,381
Nork	12%	912	7,622
Redhill West & Wray Common	12.4%	1,016	8,206
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	12.9%	1,054	8,171
Horley West & Sidlow	13.2%	1,123	8,478
Horley East & Salfords	13.3%	1,044	7,878
Earlswood & Whitebushes	13.5%	1,093	8,077
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	13.8%	1,208	8,729
Tattenham Corner & Preston	15.7%	1,281	8,158
South Park & Woodhatch	16.2%	1,137	7,006
Banstead Village	16.3%	1,397	8,578
Horley Central & South	17.1%	1,415	8,290

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

31.6% to 54.7%

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent ranged from 31.6% in Tattenham Corner & Preston to 54.7% in Meadvale & St John's — a gap of 23.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Tattenham Corner & Preston	31.6%	2,580	8,158
Horley Central & South	32%	2,653	8,290
Horley West & Sidlow	33%	2,799	8,478
Banstead Village	33.7%	2,895	8,578
South Park & Woodhatch	34.4%	2,409	7,006
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	36.2%	3,163	8,729
Horley East & Salfords	37.1%	2,926	7,878
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	39.3%	3,213	8,171
Nork	41.3%	3,146	7,622
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	41.8%	3,340	8,000
Earlswood & Whitebushes	42.5%	3,435	8,077
Redhill West & Wray Common	45.5%	3,735	8,206
Redhill East	48.3%	3,562	7,381
Reigate	54.3%	4,680	8,612
Meadvale & St John's	54.7%	3,802	6,947

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

7.7% to 16.8%

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 7.7% in Reigate to 16.8% in Horley Central & South — a gap of 9.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Reigate	7.7%	350	4,564
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	7.9%	299	3,778
Meadvale & St John's	8.2%	289	3,524
Nork	8.9%	312	3,522
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	8.9%	358	4,035
Horley East & Salfords	10.7%	421	3,947
Banstead Village	10.9%	402	3,676
Redhill East	11%	421	3,844
Horley West & Sidlow	12.2%	517	4,234
Earlswood & Whitebushes	13.6%	567	4,182
Redhill West & Wray Common	15%	625	4,165
Tattenham Corner & Preston	15.6%	658	4,226
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	16.6%	723	4,355
South Park & Woodhatch	16.7%	593	3,549
Horley Central & South	16.8%	715	4,254

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

4% to 26.4%

Homes rented from a council or housing association ranged from 4% in Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton to 26.4% in South Park & Woodhatch — a gap of 22.4 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 15 of 15 current wards with comparable figures.

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented from a council or housing association · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Lower Kingswood, Tadworth & Walton	4%	161	4,033
Chipstead, Kingswood & Woodmansterne	4.4%	167	3,778
Nork	4.5%	159	3,522
Horley East & Salfords	5.5%	219	3,947
Meadvale & St John's	6.1%	215	3,523
Reigate	6.6%	301	4,563
Banstead Village	6.6%	243	3,676
Redhill East	9.1%	348	3,843
Horley Central & South	10.9%	462	4,254
Earlswood & Whitebushes	13.5%	563	4,182
Horley West & Sidlow	13.8%	584	4,231
Redhill West & Wray Common	18.1%	752	4,161
Hooley, Merstham & Netherne	19.7%	859	4,353
Tattenham Corner & Preston	22.1%	936	4,228
South Park & Woodhatch	26.4%	938	3,549

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

15 mapped electoral wards · May 2026. The same wards are available in the named list below. These are council boundaries, not police neighbourhoods.

Choose a ward

These are electoral wards or the explicitly labelled statistical equivalents. They do not necessarily match villages, parishes or police neighbourhoods.